<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://sti.bmj.com">
<title>Sexually Transmitted Infections BASHH column</title>
<link>http://sti.bmj.com</link>
<description>Sexually Transmitted Infections RSS feed -- recent BASHH column articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Sexually Transmitted Infections</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1368-4973</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sti.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/88/4/239?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://sti.bmj.com/site/homepage/STI_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://sti.bmj.com/site/homepage/STI_95x60.gif">
<title>Sexually Transmitted Infections</title>
<url>http://sti.bmj.com/site/homepage/STI_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://sti.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://sti.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/88/4/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why we like clinical guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://sti.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/88/4/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>"What are the best things about BASHH (British Association for Sexual Health and HIV)?" was a question posed in the strategy consultation held in August 2011. Patient care and clinical governance was seen as an &lsquo;extremely high&rsquo; priority for BASHH by almost everyone responding, and the &lsquo;best thing&rsquo; chosen by 96% of the 258 members participating were the clinical guidelines (J Wilson, personal communication). These were given as the main reasons for using the BASHH website by 98% of those responding, and were said to be &lsquo;completely&rsquo; or &lsquo;mostly&rsquo; relevant to their clinical practice. The usage figures for the website substantiate this, with the guidelines receiving nearly 100 000 hits each year,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> a dramatic growth since the first national guideline (gonorrhoea) was published in 1996.</p> <p>At that time, the Clinical Effectiveness Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, was beginning to apply structured methods of guideline evaluation, notably...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[FitzGerald, M., Kingston, M. A., BASHH Clinical Effectiveness Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-12T04:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:sextrans;sextrans-2012-050533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>The Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Disease</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Drugs: infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, HIV / AIDS, Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, HIV infections, Urethritis, Vulvovaginal disorders, Guidelines]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why we like clinical guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>BASHH column</prism:section>
<prism:volume>88</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
